Map the project lifecycle, find the phases where margin and time actually leak, and stand up the cost-tracking the office never had.
A full pipeline that survives the project.
Construction firms rarely lose money on the bid. They lose it between the bid and the handover — in change orders that never get billed, crews that idle between phases, and a margin that evaporates somewhere on site. We find where, then we close the leak.
One lens, three moves.
The diagnosis decides which to lead with. Consulting fixes the operation, automation puts it on a system, and AI takes the parts that earned the right to be automated. In construction, that looks like this.
Project, scheduling and procurement on one system of record — change orders captured the moment they happen, not at month-end.
Agents that chase the documentation, flag the unbilled change order, and keep the schedule honest without another coordinator.
The pains we press first.
Same nine questions across every sector, sharpened to this one. The first hour decides which to press, and whether the answer is consulting, automation, or AI.
-
01 · Generate clients when everyone bids the same job.
Demand engineering in a crowded local market: a pipeline that doesn't depend on being the cheapest number in the room.
-
02 · Run the operation through a doubling crew.
Standard work and decision rights that hold when headcount jumps a job ahead of the process.
-
03 · Bill what you actually built.
Capture every change order and variation so the margin you priced is the margin you keep.